주메뉴바로가기 본문바로가기

학술자료

다양한 고고학적 자료를 통해 가야문화의 역사와 가치를 살펴보세요.

석사

金官加耶와 廣開土王碑文 庚子年 南征記事 : 김해지역 고고학 발굴성과를 중심으로

(A) Study of The Geumgwan-Gaya and Epigraph of Gwanggaeto Gyeongjanyeonjo(庚子年條)

목록
  • 저자 송원영
  • 시대
  • 학술지명
  • 페이지 911.0359 4
  • 학위수여기관 부산대학교
  • 학위논문사항 사학과 2010. 8
  • 발행지역
  • 발행년도 2010

초록(영문)

The mainstream theory was previously connected to the epigraph of Gwanggaeto Gyeongjanyeonjo(庚子年條) and Daeseongdong Tumuluses building and halting related to 4 5th century Gimhae Geumgwan-Gaya. But the epigraph of Gwanggaeto Gyeongjanyeonjo was just an exaggerated mark and Daeseongdong Tumuluses was never built and halted archeologically. It is presumed 'Wae'(倭) on the epigraph of Gwanggaeto was not hired soldiers but offered work forces as Japanese immigrants settling down Gaya. The origin of Imnagara ongbalseong(任那加羅從拔城) as a castle King Suro constructed is guessed to Boonseong in connection with jongbal=jongbari=boon(盆)-(a small bowl). However this is just a meaning that GeumgwanGaya was a strong political group with power threatening Silla measuring its strength against Goguryeo then. Also Bonghwangtoseong(Jongbalseong) a main residential area lasted from 4th to in the late of 5th century so it is assumed the political body in Gimhae area hadn't broken off as of 400 years. Lately according to the developing site excavation of Gaya‘s forest the second hill liked to Daeseongdong Tumuluses and major tumuluses after the first half of 5th century suceeding Daeseongdong Tumuluses in the ridge of this hill were existed. The case tumuluses leading to this adjacent special hill is located turns up in relation between Yangdongri Tumuluses and Hoopori Tumuluses main tombs of GeumgwanGaya and neighboring Bokcheondong Tumuluses and Yeonsandong Tumuluses Because tumuluses in the center of Daeseongdong Tumuluses was in the early of 5th century at the earliest that the construction was halted by Goguryeo army's conquest of the south in A.D 400 years doesn't match with the time. The theory of Goguryeo conquest of the south stands in view of Goguryeo Jeokseok(tomb with stone mounds) technique selection and Goguryeo relics excavated from the tomb type of the ruling class with the record Shilla area including Gyeongju was under Goguryeo's control. An exaggerated expression on the epitaph in accord with King Jangsoo's Southward Advance Policy(南進政策) in some respects: no record about Goguryeo army's conquest of the south in the books 'SamGukSaGi(三國史記)' and 'SamGukYouSa(三國遺事)' no excavation for the tomb type of Goguryeo selection or Goguryeo relics contrary Silla and no construction stop of tumuluses in the sphere of GeumgwanGaya including Daeseongdong Tumuluses. For this reason the theory GeumgwanGaya fell by Goguryeo army's conquest of the south in A.D 400 years and the study for the latter part of the Gaya history has to be reconsidered.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말 1 Ⅱ. 기존의 연구성과 4 Ⅲ. 비문에 나타난 ‘倭’와 임나가라 ‘從拔城’ 13 1. 비문에 보이는 ‘왜’의 성격 13 2. 임나가라 ‘종발성’의 위치 16 Ⅳ. 금관가야의 고구려 문화 수용여부 28 1. 금관가야의 유적과 유물 28 2. 금관가야와 고구려 문화의 관련성 39 Ⅴ. 대성동고분군의 축조현황과 고구려 남정기사의 비판 49 1. 대성동고분군의 축조현황 49 2. 고구려 남정기사의 비판 54 Ⅵ. 맺음말 60 도면 62 참고문헌 70 Abstract 74